• New Events
  • Feed
  • Subject
    • Eat
    • Sleep
    • Visit
    • Read
    • Listen
    • Watch
    • Life
    • Moonridge
  • Trending
  • Karen
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe

Always Packed for Adventure!

It's the destination and the journey.

  • New Events
  • Feed
  • Subject
    • Eat
    • Sleep
    • Visit
    • Read
    • Listen
    • Watch
    • Life
    • Moonridge
  • Trending
  • Karen
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe

Movie Review- 42

Let me get something out of the way, I hate baseball. Luckily, 42 isn't really a baseball movie. Of course, the Jackie Robinson bio-pic has plenty of scenes of at the ballpark and showing his athleticism, but it's much more of a civil rights story than it is a sports movie.

42 is a solid movie and important story. It's the type of movie that will join the ranks of Stand and Deliver and Lean on Me, as movies shown in a junior high class room on a sub day. The kind of movie that a kid will enjoy once or twice, but learn to hate it when forced to watch it repeatedly. 

Although it's a big studio picture and has the star power of Harrison Ford, it has the vibe of a Hallmark Hall of Fame movie. Harrison Ford did not need to be in 42.   Ford plays Branch Rickey, a Major League Baseball executive intent on breaking the color barrier in the game he loves. Although Rickey is instrumental in the story, 42 devotes far too much screen time to the character. Rickey's motive and sentiment are expressed in a repetitive manner. If a lesser known actor had been cast in the part, I'm sure that several scenes would have been eliminated. I wish this had been the case, as although Ford is a fine actor, his being cast did not add significantly to the movie.

As it should be, the scene stealer in the movie is Chadwick Boseman, who plays Jackie Robinson. He completely carries the movie and although he has already been in a number of movies and television shows, I feel like this movie will be a career changer for him. He shines. 

One huge casting surprise was Alan Tudyk playing the manager of the Philadelphia Phillies. My experience with Tudyk has comedic roles and affable characters, I almost didn't recognize him spewing hateful racial slurs and being such a despicable character. 

The movie serves as a scary reminder that it wasn't too long ago that segregation laws were still in effect. I found it interesting that the Robinson's were from Pasadena and although I'm sure they experienced racism in Pasadena, they did not see segregated facilities until they traveled in the south. My parents moved from Southern California to Virginia in the early 1960's and although my parents were white, they were just as shocked by the Jim Crow laws. Living in Los Angeles, it's sometimes easy to forget that America is a very diverse country.

Although things are slowly getting better, racism is clearly still a problem today. One recent example to hit the news was country singer Darius Rucker receiving a racist comment via twitter. A person, who has since had their Twitter account closed, wrote the following comment to Rucker, "Leave country to the white folk". Rather than let the comment slide, Rucker responded with "I'll take my Grand Ole Opry membership and leave your racism. " As horrible as it is that the comment was ever made, I think it's a positive thing that Ruckus responded to it and in general the response has been that racist comments will not be tolerated. People need to express out loud what won't be tolerated and stick up for what they believe in. Dialogue is important. The change is slow, but it's happening. I think it will happen more and more, as the generations become distanced from those who grew up during segregation.

The movie also made a nice parallel to currently civil rights battles, namely the gay rights movement. As a society, I think that one day we will look back and be ashamed by the anti-gay protests and use of derogatory slurs. It's a change that will also come slowly, but surely, it's a change that will be made. 42 isn't just a story about fighting racism, but a story about battling discrimination wherever it may occur.

When I was in elementary school, my mom bought me a series of books called Value Tales. Each book featured a Historical figure whose actions exhibited a certain value. In the series, the value of courage was the book featuring Jackie Robinson. The movie 42  isn't a movie about baseball, it's a movie about courage.

 

 

tags: value tales books, value tales courage jackie robinson, jackie robinson, jackie robinson movie 42, movie review 42, harrison ford as branch rickey in 42, chadwick boseman as jackie robinson in 42, alan tudyk in 42, philadephia phillies, stand and deliver, lean on me, movies shown in american schools, movies shown with a substitute is teaching, inspirational movies to show kids, inspirational movies of the 80's, baseball movies, jackie robinson bio movie, movies about civil rights, civil rights issues, jim crow laws, segregation, darius rucker, darius rucker twitter controvesy, darius rucker and racism, racism in country music, gay rights movement
categories: Movie Review, Watch
Thursday 05.23.13
Posted by Karen Lea Germain
 

Movie Review- Star Trek Into Darkness

We had just finished eating dinner last night, when Dan had an intense desire to see a movie. It happens to me all of the time. I always want to go to a movie and it takes zero convincing, but Dan is usually not as eager, especially on a work night. I decided to take his desire to go to a movie and run with it. 

He sat at our dining room table, using a movie app on his Iphone and suddenly he became overwhelmingly excited. Dan just won his movie lottery when he discovered that the Arclight in Hollywood had a special 9pm sneak peek showing of Star Trek Into Darkness and with less than two hours before show time, we could still get seats. 

We threw the dishes into the sink and hopped over the hill into Hollywood. Although our tickets were bought and seats reserved, we thought that we should get there early. We arrived to discover that our showing was to take place in the Historic Cinerama Dome. 

This created a bit of panic, as the seats that we had secured where in the second row from the front, on the very end of the middle section. I had not been to the Cinerama Dome in many years, not since the Arclight remodel, so I had no clue what we were getting ourselves into. We tossed around the idea of asking for a refund and going to another movie, but the lure of seeing the very first showing of Star Trek Into Darkness, was too great. We killed time at Amoeba Records. 

Our seats turned out to be great. Maybe a tad too close, but not in an uncomfortable way. The showing was definitely full, but not completely sold out. There were a few huge Star Trek fans, showing up in costumes, but overall, the tone was much more subdued than I had anticipated. I thought that there would be a greater level of excitement and maybe even some sort of promotion or special tie in. Nope, nothing.  

I hate to admit it, but the 3-D was pretty spectacular. I still don't think that 3-D is necessary for any film and in most cases does not add significantly to my enjoyment of the movie, especially for the up-charge in ticket prices. However, this is one to see in 3-D. It was beautifully done, without being overly gimmicky. One of my favorite shots was at the very end, a long shot through the corridors of the Enterprise. It's simple, but just looked great in 3-D, without needing a gimmick.  

This is solid summer blockbuster type of movie. It's pure entertainment and although it isn't likely to be a big contender for award season (except for technical honors), it is definitely a cut above average for the genre. 

That being said, the first one was better. Into Darkness ran a tad long and had way too many action sequences. At times, I felt like I was on a simulator ride at a theme park because the action sequences were happening in such close proximity that I didn't have time to recover or soak it in. In this case, the old adage, "Less is more" would have been apt.

When not in the middle of intense action, the tone shifted to comedy. There are many great bits of comedic dialogue and memorable one-liners, but after awhile, the jokes were the same. They were making the same sentiments and observations, just rephrasing it. It grew old in the last half of the movie.

The best thing about J.J. Abrams reboot is the casting. This franchise really has the best actors in each role and this adds a great deal to the entertainment value. In particular, I loved the addition of Benedict Cumberbatch. 

Star Trek Into Darkness is good early start to the summer blockbuster season. It made for a fun spontaneous mid-week date night! 

tags: star trek reboot, star trek into darkness, star trek into darkness review, jj abram's star trek into darkness review, benedict cumberbatch star trek, summer movies star trek into darkness, best 3-d movies star trek into darkness, i hate 3-d, not a fan of 3-d, arclight hollywood, arclight hollywood sneak peak star trek into, cinerama dome review, cinerama dome hollywood best seats, arclight hollywood review, star trek into darkness thursday sneak peek, amoeba records hollywood
categories: Movie Review, Watch
Thursday 05.16.13
Posted by Karen Lea Germain
 

Movie Review- Oblivion

The new Tom Cruise sci-fi/action movie, Oblivion, is proof that creative sets and amazing action sequences, do not necessarily equal a great story.

The story is set in the future, after earth has been abandoned following a devastating war with aliens. The humans won the war, but the planet was left inhabitable. Cruise plays Jack, a man sent to repair the drones that protect the earth's vital resources. Jack is teamed up with a woman, Victoria, who works from their temporary home hovering in the clouds above earth. Victoria guides via home computer, as he makes the dangerous daily missions out into Earth, which still has alien activity. Jack finds evidence on earth that makes him question their mission and those in control.

Oblivion has a lot going for it. The actors are all very good, including a small part played by legend, Morgan Freeman. The scene stealer is Andrea Riseborough, who plays Victoria. All of the actors handle the ridiculous plot and unconvincing dialogue like true professionals.

The action sequences are hollow, but look spectacular. I felt like I was watching someone playing a video game or I was on a ride at a theme park.  

The movie looks beautiful. In particular, I loved the imagination that went into creating Victoria and Jack's sky house, which included the coolest pool ever! Early in the movie, the scenes of the post war earth are creepy and affecting, including showing major monuments like the Empire State building. This grows old though, especially with the (insert groan) shot of the Statue of Liberty torch during a chase sequence through a canyon. It was out of place. There are many dream sequences in the movie, done with flickering black and white, which just look great. 

I was completely drawn in to the first thirty minutes or so of the movie. It was mysterious enough to keep me captivated and to give it the benefit of the doubt.

Then things took a turn for the silly. 

Really silly.  

Silly and dull.  

Loads of plot holes and things to question. The big twist in the movie was a surprise, but it was so dumb that it didn't matter. They lost me at that point. We should have walked out of the theater and surely if we had rented this at home, we would have turned it off and cut our losses.  

 

 

SPOILERS (FOR THOSE WHO HAVE SEEN IT)- MY RANT

Here are some of the things that drove me extra nuts...why are there only two of them for the project? Why even bother with clones? Or if the clones are necessary, why bother disgusing them as humans? Are the aliens really that afraid of a band of misfits on earth, especially when they clearly have superior fighting power and can just wipe them out? Why haven't they wiped them out?

Why bother returning Cruise's wife to the main ship? Why wouldn't the aliens just destroy the wife, the two clones and start with new clones? They had already proven that killing off the clones isn't a big deal.

 If the flight recorder box was so important to the wife, then why didn't she listen to it immediately after they recovered it?

Is there a more flimsy excuse than Freeman's character seeing the humanity in Jack after he picks up the book and saves the girl? 

It is way too big of a coincidence that Jack just happens upon the pod of his wife. Convenient... 

And the worst... 

When did they have time to make a baby??? I guess that one night in the cabin, but could there have been a more cheesy ending?  Nope. Painful.

 

tags: oblivion movie review, tom cruise oblivion review, morgan freeman oblivion review, andrea riseborough oblivion review, bad sci-fi movies oblivion, bad tom cruise movies oblivion, plot holes in oblivion, bad writing in oblivion, sky house in oblivion, bad action movies oblivion, bad movies 2013 oblivion, bad alien movies oblivion, empire stae building oblivion, statue of liberty torch oblivion, why a baby in oblivion, movies with cheesy endings oblivion, movies with clones oblivion, why clones in oblivion, who cares about the flight recorder in oblivion, why not just start with new clones in oblivion, felt like a theme park ride, felt like a video game, beautiful sets bad script, bad story, blockbuster movies with bad stories
categories: Movie Review, Watch
Sunday 04.28.13
Posted by Karen Lea Germain
 
Newer / Older

Powered by Squarespace 6