• New Events
  • Feed
  • Subject
    • Eat
    • Sleep
    • Visit
    • Read
    • Listen
    • Watch
    • Life
    • Moonridge
  • Trending
  • Karen
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe

Always Packed for Adventure!

It's the destination and the journey.

  • New Events
  • Feed
  • Subject
    • Eat
    • Sleep
    • Visit
    • Read
    • Listen
    • Watch
    • Life
    • Moonridge
  • Trending
  • Karen
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe

Movie Review- The Place Beyond the Pines

The Place Beyond the Pines stars super hot Hollywood actors sporting really awful haircuts. In Ryan Goslings case, he has a bad haircut, bad hair color, bad clothes,  bad fake tattoos, et..

Kidding aside, The Place Beyond the Pines was a decent movie, a rarity for an early spring release.

The Place Beyond the Pines, follows two men, as their lives connect through a tragic circumstance. Ryan Gosling plays Luke, a carnival motorcycle stunt rider, who learns that he has fathered a son when he hooked up during the carnival's pass through Schenectady the previous year. He turns to bank robbery as a means to get quick cash to care for his child. Bradley Cooper plays the cop who pursues Gosling's character and has his own morality called into question when he becomes involved with a shady group of fellow police officers. The overriding themes are not only of the moral issues that confront the characters in the present, but the idea of generations repeating the patterns of their parents and nature vs. nurture. 

I was most excited to see this movie based on the director/writer, Derek Cianfrance. Cianfrance's 2010 emotional roller coaster Blue Valentine, blew me away with its intensity and honesty. I thought it was best movie of 2010.  The trailer for The Place Beyond the Pines didn't catch my attention, but the names involved did the trick.

This is an ambitious movie, very large in scale and themes. It's not what you would expect based on the trailer. It's extremely broad and there is no one central character. In fact, although Gosling and Cooper having starring roles, there are several very significant roles in the movie played by lesser known actors. This is very much an ensemble piece. 

In particular, Ray Liotta plays a great menacing villain, contributing heavily to some of the more intense moments in the movie.  

I felt like this movie bit-off more than it could chew and often times, it didn't quite gel, although I applaud the effort. The running time is two hours and twenty minutes and upon exiting the theater, I could have sworn that it was over three hours. The pacing is sluggish. There were many times when the same information and emotion could have been conveyed in a simplier manner. I felt like we were watching an extended directors cut. Cianfrance had many beautifully shot scenes and affecting writing, but he really needed to "Kill His Darlings" for the benefit of the whole movie.

The movie is artfully shot and sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I loved the opening sequence of  Gosling walking through the fair, shot from a perspective of right behind him. It captures the tone perfectly. The car chase sequence with Gosling and Cooper, shot from Cooper's perspective with shaky, realistic camera work is one of the best parts of the movie. It completely feeds in to Cooper's character's muddled memories and frame of mind.  

What I didn't care for, was the over use of extreme close-ups and the overly dramatic film score. The score really ruined moments in the movie, adding a melodrama factor that wouldn't have been there otherwise. Again, it's all about keeping it simply stated and not adding that extra layer of drama that doesn't need to be there. As a movie goer, I shouldn't have actively noticed the score and it certainly shouldn't have been a distraction. The score created a barrier and a disconnect from the story. 

The grandiose nature of the story would have maybe better lent itself to a novel, rather than a movie. There is so much going on with themes and characters, that it was hard to have them fully realized in a movie format. There are many interesting ideas thrown around creating a story that easily lends itself to conversation and debate. It stuck with us long after walking out of the theater and we were talking about it off and on all day.

This wasn't nearly as affecting as Blue Valentine, but even with the imperfections, it was a solid story with strong acting and often beautifully shot. It's worth seeing in the theater.

tags: blue valentine, blue valentine review, a place beyond the pines, a place beyond the pines review, bradley cooper a place beyond the pines, ryan gosling a place beyond the pines, ray liotta a place beyond the pines, movies about corrupt cops, a movie about bank robbers, great motorcycle chase movies, great car chases in movies, intense movies, derek cianfrance, derek cianfrance blue valentine review, derek cianfrance a place beyond the pines, bradley cooper bad haircut, ryan gosling bad haircut, hot actors with bad haircuts, best movie 2010 blue valentine, menacing villan ray liotta, ensemble movies 2013, best movies 2013, movies that would have been better as a book, kill your darlings, cianfrance should kill his darlings, derek cianfrance writing, nature vs nurture movies, repeating the patterns of your parents, morality movies, movies with moral dilemmas
categories: Movie Review, Watch
Wednesday 04.17.13
Posted by Karen Lea Germain
 

Movie Review- Oz the Great and Powerful

My second theater experience in England was very different from my first. Dan and I went with his five year old daughter to see Disney's Oz the Great and Powerful at the Vue Cinemas in Newbury. In contrast to the theater at the Corn exchange, Vue is a megaplex in a modern building.

Here is the town view from the enormous windows in the lobby of the cinema. 

​The town of Newbury.

A big thanks to Dan's parents for not only treating us to the movie, but splurging for the upgraded seats. The seats that we had were reserved seats in the dead center, best spot in the theater. The upgraded seats were not only in the best spot, but they were wider with more leg room and plusher. Very nice!

I read many negative reviews about the movie and went in thinking that I was going to hate it. It was the only movie appropriate for Dan's daughter, so it was the only option. I didn't love the movie, but it was much better than anticipated.

The problems first... 

It had way too much CGI, especially early on in the film. It was unnecessary and just didn't look very good. The movie nearly lost me at the start, because I really didn't like the entire set up in Kansas. It was stylized and bizarre. Although it set up the characters, it didn't seem to mesh with the rest of the movie. 

 Loads of Corny bits, especially in Oz with the Munchkins. This is one of those movies that's aimed directly at kids and not at families as a whole. It does have some dark scenes, but Dan's daughter wasn't frightened at all. It doesn't look like it from the trailers, but this is a movie for kids. It was a bit like (although a tad better) last year's abysmal Snow White movie, Mirror Mirror. I feel like it's always a bit of a failure when a family movie isn't enjoyable for the entire family. 

The movie lacked the creativity of The Wizard of Oz. One of my favorite aspects of the 1939 movie, was when Dorothy and the gang go into the Emerald city and it's like this whole self contained world. The movie didn't have a good sense of place. The world of Oz was just a CGI fest. 

For a movie with so much going on, there was a distinct lack of urgency. When Oswald first arrives in Oz, he just quickly accepts the fact and acts like everything that is happening to him is completely normal. Maybe because it's a kids movie and there are a lot of characters and plot to cram in, but it seemed like everything that happens to the characters is accepted very quickly and they move forward. Most bizarre is Mila Kunis as the Wicked Witch, she starts out as a sweet and good character, but is transformed into pure evil with the quickest turn around. She has a motive, but it happens so fast that it's hard to buy. 

We didn't see it in 3-D, but it easy to see every single 3-D gimmick. This movie is very gimmicky. 

There was some stuff that was well done. The movie is well cast, although clearly all of these actors probably wish that they could have the paycheck and leave the movie off their resume.  

I liked the tie-ins to The Wizard of Oz, such as having the same actor play a character in Kansas and also in Oz. Although, I felt like Mila Kunis should have played the woman that Oswald seduces at the carnival, as it parallels her situation in Oz. This was a story inconsistency to me.

I have not read any of the Oz books, but I liked the origin story for the wizard and the witches. It worked. It would have worked better in a movie aimed more at adults. It could have been darker, like my favorite Oz movie, Return to Oz. 

I thought that the movie ended with a nice moral. The wizard is not a very commendable or likable character for a majority of the story, but it ended on a positive note, a story of friendship, courage and right over might.  

Ultimately, this movie had the nuts and bolts in place, but could have been made more thoughtfully. It was lacking enough to make it hard to recommend to anyone over the age of ten.

 

tags: oz the great and powerful, oz the great and powerful movie review, vue cinema newbury review, newbury england picture, mila kunis oz great and powerful, bad 3-d movies oz great and powerful, return to oz, the wizard of oz, movies with bad cgi oz the great and powerful, whats wrong with oz the great and powerful, munchkins, oz the great and powerful just for kids
categories: Movie Review, Trips and Travels, Watch
Monday 03.25.13
Posted by Karen Lea Germain
 

Movie Review- Song for Marion

On the Saturday night of our trip to England, Dan's parents took me to their local cinema to see Song For Marion. 

My first movie experience in England.​

The theater was at the top level of the Corn Exchange in Newbury. The building that houses the cinema was built in 1862 and as the name implies, was originally a space where merchants exchanged corn. In 1993, The Corn Exchange was transformed into a performing arts center, with the top level housing a small, single screen cinema. 

 The theater holds about fifty-sixty people and has assigned seating. Dan's parents purchased our tickets about a month in advance, something that I can't imagine having to do at any of our local theaters. The screening of Song for Marion completely filled up. 

Song for Marion is a tear jerker.  It's the worst kind of tear jerker, the kind that starts at the early on in the film and doesn't let up. A tear jerker combined with the jet lag that I was experiencing was a recipe for an emotional evening out. I was not alone though, the entire theater was filled with sniffling and everyone walked out with red eyes and crumpled hankies. 

That being said, I really enjoyed Song for Marion. Vanessa Redgrave plays Marion, a woman dying of cancer, whose curmudgeon husband (Terence Stamp) must find a way to deal with his grief and repair his relationship with his estranged son. His wife finds fun and solace during her final months through participating in a choir for senior citizens, something that her husband just cannot understand. The choir and it's bubbly director become a force in both of their lives. 

The story was mostly solid, although I would have liked to have had a little more background on the father/son estrangement. It's an important element to the story, yet it seemed glossed over. The story focused on the fact that they are estranged, rather than how it happened. I wanted a bit more.  

I think that it's a given that Terence Stamp and Vanessa Redgrave will give an outstanding performance in any role. I was really impressed with two of the other leads, Gemma Arterton (Choir Director) and Christopher Eccleston (estranged son). Arerton and Eccleston both held their own against the powerhouse duo of Stamp and Redgrave. I feel like all four really drove the movie and delivered emotional performances. If the movie had weaker performances, it may have turned into an overly sentimental mess.  

The levity of the choir group gives balance to the painful emotions that Marion's family are experiencing. This balance is what makes Song for Marion ultimately an uplifting story, without ever feeling trite, disingenuous or sappy.

 

tags: song for marion, song for marion movie review, the corn exchange newbury, review of the corn exchange newbury, review of cinema at corn exchange newbury, terence stamp song for marion, gemma arterton song for marion, christopher eccleston song for marion, vanessa redgrave song for marion, movies about grief song for marion, movies about choirs song for marion, tear jerker movies song for marion, my first movie in england, movie theaters in newbury england
categories: Trips and Travels, Movie Review, Watch
Wednesday 03.20.13
Posted by Karen Lea Germain
 
Newer / Older

Powered by Squarespace 6